The Wilmot Proviso, initiated in 1846 by Congressman David
Wilmot, called for the end of slavery in states acquired from Mexico during and
subsequent to the Mexico-American war. Whitman supported the proviso, though it
eventually failed in the Senate, and is now historically regarded as one of the
events leading to the Civil War. This proviso reflected enhanced division
between the North and South regarding slavery.
I have mixed thoughts about Whitman and racism from “Song of
Myself.” I can’t seem to decipher his position on it. For the time, it probably
seemed provocative and possibly seditious for him to harbor a runway slave,
yet, when he lists among the jobs and activities of persons in Canto 16, he
mentions “the quadroon girl is sold at the auction-stand” as just one activity among others without explicitly denouncing it. If his interest is social
reform, he should probably say something by way of resistance. I think this
is an example of Whitman’s encoded inconsistencies, his contradictions that led
him to famously exclaim: “Do I contradict myself? Very well then, I contradict
myself (I am large, I contain multitudes.).”
Maybe, but to me Whitman is the ultimate relativist, and
cannot provide a moral compass by which we may guide our actions. He is as “wicked” as “righteous;” he
simply belongs to every position to which one can ascribe. He loves nature, but
has no qualms with killing animals for sport. He is a loafer, but also a
capitalist. For what other reason might one work hard and compile one’s poems?
They are no longer “thoughts,” but thereby become commodities.